PCI DSS and Piracy January 12, 2012Posted by Heather Mark in PCI DSS, Piracy & Maritime Security.
Tags: cybersecurity, Heather Mark, InfoSec, InfoSec & Privacy, Maritime Security, mark consulting group, PCI DSS, Piracy & Maritime Security
I’ve been reading quite a bit on piracy lately. Not the adventurous, swashbuckling tales of pirates flying down the Spanish Main, but piracy in its present form. From a purely detached perspective, its an interesting exercise in cause and effect. Natural disasters, for example, have an impact on the surge in piratical acts. The Christmas Tsunami left many Somali fishing villages devastated and took the last legal means of sustenance from many families that depended fishing for their survival. As a result, they turned to piracy. Of course, that is not to say that Somali pirates are the Jean val Jean’s of their day, the thief with the heart of gold doing only what is necessary to survive. These pirates are violent and aggressive and should not be coddled. The interesting comparison to the PCI DSS, in my mind, derives from the impact of the crime on the industry and the global reaction to the phenomenon.
Impact of the Crime
Piracy is a crime that has an impact on all consumers. Higher insurance rates, security contingents, longer routes and therefore higher fuel costs, and similar circumstances that result from piracy mean higher prices for consumers. Any costs that cannot (or will not) be absorbed by the manufacturer or the shipping company are passed on to the consumer. Similarly, data thieves have very definitely left their mark on the consumer. Those of us involved in the electronic payment industry recognize better than most the increased cost structure that has resulted from trying to achieve and maintain compliance with the PCI DSS and the countless data security, data breach notification and consumer privacy laws at play in the United States. Ongoing compliance and security monitoring, evaluating the threat landscape and the cost of validating compliance can quickly add up for companies. Organizations that are already seeing their margins get squeezed are required to spend additional resources on security and compliance to ensure the safety of consumers’ data. Those costs can sometimes be passed along to the consumer.
Data security and piracy were both issues that “flew under the radar” until high-profile instances brought them to the public awareness. In the world of transoceanic shipping, the issues that brought awareness were a couple of kidnappings for ransom and the hijacking of the Maersk Alabama. It’s important to note, however, that even before these incidents, the shipping industry and governments worldwide were working on standards and regulations that would mitigate the problem.Â The reaction from the industry should sound very familiar to veterans of the PCI DSS compliance world – “The standards are too prescriptive.” “The standards were written by people that don’t
really understand the issues.” “How are you going to ensure that everyone is complying with these standards?’ “The cost of complying with the standards are too burdensome for small companies.” These concerns should resonate with payment security professionals. The same questions and concerns are often raised about the PCI DSS.
For the payment industry, the events that really brought public awareness were a couple of high-profile data breaches at well-known retailers. The question really is, though, “What is the alternative?” If neither industry had done anything to address these growing issues, the constituents in the industry would have raised the alarm about the apparent lack of concern from the powers that be. The catch-22 of the creation and enforcement of the standards is that even though these standards achieve their objective of raising industry awareness and attempting to mitigate the risk of adverse events, the companies that suffer piracy attacks or data breaches are still often cast as the villian (as opposed to the victim) in the scenario.
What’s the Answer?
That is the crux of the matter – are the issues of data security and high seas piracy “solvable?” There are a variety of issues that drive the increase in both crimes. Economic stability, the ability of governments to project their authority into these areas, jurisdictional cooperation and other factors drive the growth of both types of crimes.
While I cannot confidently address permanent solutions to either problem, I can suggest a shift in perspective. In the realm of data security and payment security, practitioners often attempt to solve the problem by layering more and more technology in front of the sensitive data. Tokenization is one example of how a shift in perspective can provide alternative solutions.Â Extracting value from the data makes significantly less attractive to thieves. So instead of asking, “How can we keep thieves from accessing the data?” one might ask “What can be done in the transaction processing chain to render the data unusable to thieves?” We are currently retro-fitting security onto a system that has been in place for fifty years. If we were to remove any preconcieved notions of what a payment infrastructure should look like, what would we design?