jump to navigation

Attacks down 65% & Hijackings down 85% from November 2010 December 13, 2011

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

According to a story published by BBC News, attacks on vessels in November 2011 were down 65% from 35 in November 2010 to 12 in November 2011.  Additionally, while 7 of the 35 attacks resulted in a hijacking in 2010, only 1 of the 12 attacks was considered ‘partially successful’.  The decline in attacks and hijackings can be attributed to several factors.  First, more ships are employing armed guards, second more ships are adhering to BMP4 and finally, the naval presence in the region is deterring attacks.  It will be interesting to see if the trend continues or if the pirates simply become more bold, or more violent in their pursuit of ransom money.

US Compliance; FFL & ITAR December 12, 2011

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

The United States allows both individuals and companies to purchase firearms for personal as well as business use.  Much to the surprise of many (even other Americans), it is a right to own automatic weapons and silenced weapons assuming the proper checks have been passed and taxes paid.  The US also allows companies to export US firearms with the appropriate licenses.  The ability to obtain firearms at a low cost and export those firearms gives US companies some advantages in armed security.  That being said, there are some very strict laws with which companies and individuals must comply.  Understand that these are Federal US laws and state laws may vary.

If your company is thinking about doing business with a US company, it is imperative that you know the rules and ensure that your vendor is in compliance.  If they are not in compliance, both the vendor and your own company may come under scrutiny and, at worst, may have legal implications.

Federal Firearms License (FFL)– This license allows individuals and companies to ‘own’ ‘manufacture’, and ‘sell’ firearms including pistols, rifles, shotguns, and the like.  A ‘class 3’ license also allows for the ownership, manufacturing, and sale of prohibited firearms such as automatic weapons, suppressors, and short barreled weapons.  In short, if a US company is claiming to have access to firearms they must possess an FFL and (this is important) all firearms must be owned under the company’s name and company’s FFL.  Remember, in the US individuals can own firearms.  It is easy for someone to purchase firearms under their personal name and claim that they are owned under the FFL.  The Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) requires very strict documentation for all firearms bought, sold, manufactured, modified, or disposed of under and FFL.

International Arms Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) controls the importation and exportation of ‘defense articles’.  This includes firearms, night vision equipment, and other items that are controlled by the US Government.   The ITAR is a component of the US’ Arms Export Control Act of 1976.  The US Government strictly prohibits and controls the export of certain firearms and other technology.  The act does allow, however, individuals to travel with up to 3 firearms for ‘personal use’ (Such as hunting) provided the individual returns with the firearms.  Disposing of the firearms is a felony.

When evaluating a US company with which to do business it is not enough to know that they have an FFL and ITAR.  You want to ensure that the company is in compliance with the regulations.  I have a drivers’ license but if I consistently drive while intoxicated, I am not in compliance with the license.  Here are some questions that you can ask your vendor.  Always get evidence of the answers and documented proof for your records.

1) Are all firearms used in conjunction with the contract purchased and owned under the company’s FFL?

2) Are only firearms registered under the FFL exported under the ITAR license?  (for each transit ensure that a list of firearms and serial numbers are listed for your records)

3) Are all firearms returned to the United States in accordance with the ITAR license?

The last point is particularly relevant and includes components of the first two.  Since many merchant vessels are operating close to areas that are on the US” prohibited list (Sri Lanka, for example), US companies are under particular scrutiny in these areas.  If the firearms are exported to the US and into the theater and then simply ‘disappear’ or are not returned to the US it could raise serious issues for the vendor and their clients.  Obviously, the US government is concerned about firearms being put in potentially the wrong hands.

**As another important point, the ITAR only allows for the exportation of firearms from the US, the vendors are responsible for obtaining all relevant licenses in countries in which the firearms will be transferred through or used.  Failure to do so can result in arrest and/or prosecution in the country in which the firearms are transferred.

In addition to obtaining all ITAR and FFL information, ask for evidence of appropriate licenses in foreign countries, as well.

By following these simply rules, and asking a few questions you can have confidence that your security vendors are operating in a manner consistent with the US Government regulations.

Piracy Delaying Food Aid November 4, 2011

Posted by Chris Mark in Piracy & Maritime Security, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

It is well known that some, if not many, Somali pirates, when hijacking vessels, have claimed to represent the “Somali Coast Guard” and other “Somali Interests”.  At the recent Combating Piracy event in London the attendees were told numerous tales about Europeans, Asians, and other who illegally fished the Somali waters and were therefore the cause of the piracy (at least a major cause).  While there is little debate that economic issues are the root cause of many Somalis joining the ranks of pirates, piracy is now beginning to adversely affect the very Somalis that many pirates claim to represent.  According to an article on CNN, piracy is delaying needed food aid to the Horn of Africa. Over 12 million people in the Horn of Africa require some form of food aid. According to Professor Mthuli Ncube, who fulfills a dual role as the bank’s chief economist and vice president the African Development Bank:

“[Piracy] affects the transit of food quickly, where it’s needed by refugees. It also brings up the costs of transporting the food and it goes beyond that into tourism, into the exploitation of hydro-carbons … the issue around fishing and so forth.  But more urgently it is about delivery of food that is being affected.”

Cyber Piracy- Clear and Present Danger (in Maritime Executive) November 2, 2011

Posted by Chris Mark in Piracy & Maritime Security, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

Maritime Executive’s Jack O’Connell published a very good article on cybercrime and its impact on the shipping industry.  Recently, Lloyds list also published an article on the same topic. With the shipping industry taking steps to prevent piracy, pirates are turning to technology to gain advantage over the shipping companies.  Read the article here.

Somali Pirates Suspected Kidnapping Aid Workers October 26, 2011

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Somali pirates are suspected in the recent abduction of 3 aid workers who were working in Somali for a Danish aid group.  The group issued a statement that said:  “Today, at 3 pm (1200 GMT) in Somalia, three staff members from the Danish Demining Group have been kidnapped. One is a Somali man, two are international staff members, an American woman and a Danish man.”  Earlier this month  Somali gunmen kidnapped two Spanish staff working for Medicins Sans Frontieres (MSF) from the Dadaab refugee camp in northern Kenya on October 13 and took them across the border into the anarchic Horn of Africa nation.  A Somali pirate who gave his name as Abdi told Reuters from Galkayo that a group of pirates was behind the abduction and the captives were being taken to a coastal haven.Previously, three people had been kidnapped from Kenya by Somali pirates and one killed.  As more vessels employ BMP and armed guards it is clear that pirates will simply look for new avenues to replace he revenue they are losing.