jump to navigation

My latest Book: Pain, Shame, and Regaining your Strength. A Warriors Guide to Surviving Male Domestic Abuse September 12, 2025

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

I recently published a book on Amazon that was very difficult to write yet, I believe, very important. Pain, Shame, and Regaining your Strength. A Warrior’s Guide to Surviving Male Domestic Abuse.

Every day, millions of men suffer in silence—victims of domestic abuse who feel they have nowhere to turn. Society tells us that men can’t be victims, that they should “man up” and handle it themselves. But the reality is far different and far more devastating.

This eye-opening book reveals the shocking truth: approximately one in ten men experience domestic violence, yet most never report it. They face disbelief, mockery, and even blame when they do speak up. From psychological manipulation that makes them question their own sanity to physical violence they’re told doesn’t count, male victims endure the same trauma as female survivors—but with virtually no support.

Through real stories and research, this book exposes how abusers use shame, isolation, and society’s blindness to trap their male victims. It reveals the sophisticated tactics that keep men silent: gaslighting that destroys their sense of reality, threats to destroy their reputation, and a system that often treats them as perpetrators rather than victims.

But there’s hope. This book provides a roadmap for recognition, healing, and breaking free from abuse. It’s essential reading for any man questioning if what he’s experiencing is abuse, for loved ones who want to help, and for anyone committed to understanding the full truth about domestic violence.

No one deserves abuse—regardless of gender.

Tim Walz: Stolen Valor and the Dishonesty of Claiming Combat Service August 10, 2024

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , ,
3 comments

EDIT(I have so little respect for this dummy I had his name as TOM). it is TIM…like…little Timmy the coward….

Recently, the Harris campaign attempted to assuage concerns over Tom Walz’ lying about his service by saying he simply “misspoke”. For those who are not veterans I feel it is appropriate to give some context to his lies. First, “Turn Tail Tom” claims, through the Harris campaign that: “Governor Walz would never insult or undermine any American’s service to this country —” Yet, through his lies he has done exactly this.

Before I go on let me be clear. EVERY veteran who has served our great nation is to be applauded regardless of the job. That $100 million jet does not fly without a technician fixing the computer system. As a former Scout Sniper, if there was not an armorer to keep my rifle in match condition, my job was degraded. While we all like to make jokes, there is a truism in the quote: “Bullets don’t fly without supply”.

Within the veteran community there are three basic groups. Those who have been in direct combat (Combat veterans), those who have served in Combat zones but NOT seen direct combat, and those who are in support roles who have not deployed (in the rear with the gear). For every ‘front line’ or ‘combat’ troop there are about 10 support personnel in the US Military. Only about 10% of the Army, Marines etc. actually are doing the fighting. This is NOT to denigrate those who provide the support rather to show how important those jobs are to the war effort.

Every veteran knows that to be a combat veteran is considered the pinnacle of respect. It is so pronounced in the USMC that the MarineTimes actually wrote an article in 2015 about the infighting called No CAR,No Respect detailing how, within the Marine Corps, those who had earned the Combat Action Ribbon were perceived to look down upon those who had not seen direct combat. In short, Tom Walz did NOT misspeak about having been a war veteran. He intentionally lied about having been in ‘war’. The question is why? We know why. He wanted the respect and cache that comes from putting oneself in harm’s way.

Being a combat veteran is so revered within the military services that each service has specialized medals, ribbons or badges that enable one to immediately identify whether a soldier, sailor, airman, or Marine is a combat veteran. In the USMC and US Navy we are issued a Combat Action Ribbon (CAR). In the Army they are issued either a Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) or the Combat Action Badge (CAB) and so on for each service.

Tom is a progressive liberal who hates guns. That is fine. By stating his ‘credentials’ (avid hunter (sure he is), war veteran), he is demonstrating his authority on the subject. This is a logical fallacy called appeal to authority. Tom Walz, in a public statement advocating for stricter gun control measures, asserted,

“We can make sure that those weapons of war, that I carried in war, is the only place where those weapons are at.”

This statement was intended to bolster his argument for restricting civilian access to certain firearms by drawing on his purported personal experience in a combat setting. By claiming firsthand knowledge of the destructive power of military-grade weapons, Walz aimed to position himself as an authoritative voice on the issue, suggesting that his experience granted him a unique and legitimate perspective on the dangers of such firearms in civilian hands.

However, it was later revealed that Walz had never served in a combat role, casting serious doubt on the authenticity of his claims. This revelation not only called into question Walz’s integrity but also highlighted the problematic nature of using appeals to authority based on false or exaggerated credentials in policy debates.

I have investigated numerous stolen valor claims and have reported a number of people on the claims. The vast majority of stolen valor claims are for people who simply want to impress a person of the opposite sex. In some cases it becomes more sinister such as in Tom Walz case where he is using the claims of combat earned by few to attempt to demonstrate authority on a subject in which he has no authority.

Shame on the Harris campaign for attempting to divert attention away from Tom Walz’ fraudulent claims of valor. In their defense, the Harris campaign stated: “In making the case for why weapons of war should never be on our streets or in our classrooms, the Governor misspoke. He did handle weapons of war Well, I supposes that makes him a combat veteran. I like fast cars. I have a fast car. I drive a Maserati. Based upon that, I suppose I can tell people I raced in the Monaco Grand Prix and am a race car driver? No, of course not. My ‘handling’ a fast car (BTW…it is NOT a race car any more than the AR 15 Tom is trying to ban is a weapon of war) does not make me a ‘race car driver’ any more than Tom is a war veteran.

He has stolen valor and should apologize personally for his shameful actions.

Harris Campaign Controversy: Tim Walz’s Military Claims Exposed August 8, 2024

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

EDIT…after being EXPOSED for lying about this military experience, the Harris campaign has decided to modify Walz’ bio…

The Harris campaign has altered its biography of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz on its campaign website, making a change to a reference to his military service amid ongoing scrutiny of the 2024 Democratic vice presidential nominee’s military credentials.

Walz’s biography initially said he was a “retired Command Sergeant Major.” 

It has since been updated to say that he “served as a command sergeant major.”

As a former Recon Marine we run into this a LOT. You see guys who say: “I was Recon” When you ask them directly, they say “I served WITH Recon”. Big difference..

The Harris campaign tried to cover for Tim Walz by releasing the following statement:

After 24 years of military service, Governor Walz retired in 2005 and ran for Congress, where he chaired Veterans Affairs and was a tireless advocate for our men and women in uniform – and as Vice President of the United States he will continue to be a relentless champion for our veterans and military families. Governor Walz would never insult or undermine any American’s service to this country — in fact, he thanks Senator Vance for putting his life on the line for our country. It’s the American way.

Great. Doesn’t change the fact he lied about going to war and carrying a weapon in war. Shame on him.

Suddenly, EVERYONE is a SNIPER July 20, 2024

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
1 comment so far

With the attempted assassination of former President Trump on July 13, 2024, it seems as if everyone has become a firearm’s expert and self proclaimed ‘sniper’ or expert on precision shooting. Today, FoxNews ran a story lauding the Secret Service Counter Sniper who took out the wanna be assassin and called the shot “1 in a million”. This blog post is simply an opportunity to educate people on ballistics and shooting and to correct some misconceptions. First things first. I have read people say that the assassin wanna be (won’t name him) ‘intentionally shot Trump in the ear’. Uh….no! Let’s talk about rifles, ballistics and accuracy. First a couple of terms:

Precision- Refers to how close a measurement is to a true or accepted value. (Rifles are measured by their precision)

Accuracy- Refers to how consistently a measurement produces the same results under unchanged conditions. (Shooters are gauged by their accuracy on a given platform)

Rifles are typically ‘rated’ or measured in terms of precision of angular measurement known as Minutes of Angle or MOA. 1 MOA is equal to 1/60th of 1 degree of a circle or 1.0472 inches PER 100 yards. For simplicity’s sake we simply use 1 inch per 100 yards. So a rifle guaranteed to shoot 1 MOA will shoot most (nearly all…but it is a statistical distribution) within 1 inch.

So, if the rifle is put in a vice, with match ammo and under perfect conditions (no wind, no temperature fluctuation or other variables during the shooting), the 1 MOA rifle will shoot nearly all rounds within 1 inch at 100 yards(not all rounds as it is a statistical measurement). This does not account for shooter ability or environmental variables. Even a world class shooter shooting a 1 MOA rifle will only be able to shoot 1 inch per 100 yards consistently as that is the capability of the rifle. This is why benchrest and other competition shooters get high precision rifles that shoot much tighter than 1 MOA.

According to news accounts, the wannabe assassin was using a DPMS or similar model AR 15 type platform. These generally only shoot about 3-4 MOA even with Match ammo. So…..the wanna be assassin at 130 yard would likely (given a 3.5 MOA rifle) only be capable of, at best, a 4.55 inch group. now…it looks like he was shooing without optics, he was wearing glasses and, being 20 years old, likely did not have a ton of shooting experience. The adrenaline and other environmental factors would have likely played a major role. I could not see the shooter being capable, under those conditions, of better than a 5 inch group (likely much more). I short, that shot in Trump’s ear was likely as much luck, as skill.

Now…the FoxNews Article talking about the SS Sniper taking a “1 in a million shot” is really reaching. That sniper likely had a high precision rifle (shooting at least 1/2 MOA if not 1/4 MOA) and that sniper had been through some top tier sniper training and had high quality optics and many thousands of rounds of experience in urban shooting scenarios taking no reflex shots. It is highly likely that sniper could shoot to the capability of his rifle and was using match ammo and was very familiar with the platform. His shot was in an estimated 2 inch spot above the shooter’s left eye. While certainly a good shot, it would have been a ‘day at the job’ for a sniper of that skill level shooting that type of platform.

Remember, shooting is a craft that is a combination of art and science. The limitations come from both the shooter and the inherent accuracy of the platform. So the next time you hear someone tell you that “years ago my mom used to drive tacks with an old .30-.30 with open sights at 100 yards” (I actually read that and was derided for correcting that statement online) it is simply not true.

“President” Biden and the 25th Amendment July 11, 2024

Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Anyone who has watched Biden over the past two years has seen a feeble old man try to act as president. It is sad and can only be described as “elder abuse” at this point. His wife…”Dr. Jill Biden” should be ashamed. She is putting her beliefs ahead of the health of her own husband. No doubt living in the limelight is addictive but this is a bridge too far.

The 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a mechanism for addressing situations where a sitting president may be unable to discharge the powers and duties of their office. Recently, discussions have emerged regarding the potential application of this amendment to President Joe Biden, with some observers raising concerns about his cognitive function and ability to fulfill his presidential responsibilities.

The 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967, outlines procedures for presidential succession and temporary transfer of power in cases of death, resignation, or inability to serve. Section 4 of this amendment specifically addresses scenarios where a president may be unable to fulfill their duties due to physical or mental incapacity[1].

While some individuals have speculated about President Biden’s cognitive health, it is crucial to approach this topic with caution and rely on objective evidence rather than partisan rhetoric. Medical professionals emphasize that age-related changes in cognitive function are normal and do not necessarily indicate dementia or incapacity[2]. Furthermore, the diagnosis of cognitive disorders requires comprehensive medical evaluation and cannot be made based on public appearances or selective video clips.

It is worth noting that the invocation of the 25th Amendment is a serious matter that requires careful consideration and substantial evidence. The process involves the Vice President and a majority of the Cabinet submitting a written declaration to Congress stating that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office[3].

To date, no official medical diagnosis or statement from White House physicians has indicated that President Biden is incapable of performing his duties. The White House has consistently maintained that the President is in good health and fully capable of executing his responsibilities[4].

While public discourse on presidential fitness is an important aspect of democratic accountability, it is essential to rely on factual information and expert medical assessments rather than speculation. The 25th Amendment exists as a safeguard for extreme circumstances, and its application should be based on clear, incontrovertible evidence of incapacity.

As citizens, it is our responsibility to remain informed and engage in constructive dialogue about the functioning of our government. However, we must also be mindful of the potential consequences of unfounded speculation and the importance of respecting due process in matters of such national significance.

In conclusion, while the 25th Amendment provides a constitutional mechanism for addressing presidential incapacity, its application to the current situation lacks substantial evidence. As the debate continues, it is crucial to prioritize factual information and expert medical opinions in assessing the fitness of any sitting president to serve.

References:

[1] U.S. Constitution, Amendment XXV. (1967). National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/amendments-11-27#toc-amendment-xxv

[2] American Psychological Association. (2020). Cognitive Aging. https://www.apa.org/topics/aging/cognitive-aging

[3] Neale, T. H. (2018). Presidential Disability Under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Constitutional Provisions and Perspectives for Congress. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45394.pdf

[4] The White House. (2021). Statement by White House Physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/11/19/statement-by-white-house-physician-dr-kevin-oconnor/