3,000,000 visitors to GlobalRiskInfo.com!! October 27, 2016Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: cnn, fox, GlobalRiskInfo, national review, security, visitors
add a comment
I want to personally say “THANK YOU!” to everyone who has taken the time to visit and read this blog. Today we officially passed 3,000,000 unique visitors! Considering that in January, I had just passed 1 million, this is a big milestone!. I have published nearly 500 posts and some odd posts get real traction. RPR Review is over 100,000 (a review of a rifle!)…Chinese stealing of Titanian Dioxide is over 100,000. Sometimes you just don’t know what will resonate! Again, Thank You!!
The Danger of Biometrics for Personal Use – Limited Legal Protection October 17, 2016Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: 4th amendment, 5th amendment, biometrics, Breach, Chris Mark, Data, fingerprint, hack, privacy, security
1 comment so far
I have never been a proponent of using Biometrics and have frequently made jokes about not wanting “the man” to have my finger prints. Well, it looks like my position may have been well founded.
Recently, it was reported in Forbes.com that on May 29th, 2016 the US Government had filed a motion for the court to require residence in a Lancaster, California home to provide their fingerprints to open an iPhone. More disturbingly, the motion called for: “authorization to depress the fingerprints and thumbprints of every person who is located at the SUBJECT PREMISES during the execution of the search and who is reasonably believed by law enforcement to be the user of a fingerprint sensor-enabled device that is located at the SUBJECT PREMISES and falls within the scope of the warrant.” In short, they didn’t just want the finger prints they wanted to force the residents to actually ‘use their finger’ to open the phone. The warrant was not available to the public, nor were other documents related to the case. Like many people, I asked “how can the courts do this?” It would seem to me like an invasion of privacy (among other things). Marina Medvin of Medvin law said: ““They want the ability to get a warrant on the assumption that they will learn more after they have a warrant. “Essentially, they are seeking to have the ability to convince people to comply by providing their fingerprints to law enforcement under the color of law – because of the fact that they already have a warrant. They want to leverage this warrant to induce compliance by people they decide are suspects later on. This would be an unbelievably audacious abuse of power if it were permitted.” Unfortunately, it was indeed permitted.
Is it legal? According to the article in Forbes:
“In past interpretations of the Fifth Amendment, suspects have not been compelled to hand over their passcode as it could amount to self-incrimination, but the same protections have not been afforded for people’s body data even if the eventual effect is the same. Citing a Supreme Court decision in Schmerber v. California, a 1966 case in which the police took a suspect’s blood without his consent, the government said self-incrimination protections would not apply to the use of a person’s “body as evidence when it may be material.”
It also cited Holt v. United States, a 1910 case, and United States v. Dionisio, a 1973 case, though it did point to more recent cases, including Virginia v. Baust, where the defendant was compelled to provide his fingerprint to unlock a device (though Baust did provide his biometric data, it failed to open the iPhone; after 48 hours of not using Touch ID or a reboot Apple asks for the code to be re-entered.).
As for the Fourth, the feds said protections against unreasonable searches did not stand up when “the taking of fingerprints is supported by reasonable suspicion,” citing 1985′s Hayes v. Florida. Other cases, dated well before the advent of smartphones, were used to justify any brief detention that would arise from forcing someone to open their device with a fingerprint.”
We do know that the warrant was served. It does appear that you cannot be forced to give up a passcode as it could amount to Self Incrimination under the 5th Amendment however you do not have the same protections for biometrics. This is another instance where the law has not kept pace with technology. For this reason, and others I will not use biometrics for personal security.
Threat Adaptation and Guns – Security 101 June 14, 2016Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.
Tags: assault weapon, ban, gun control, http://affa.hells-angels.com/, Orlando, sandy hook, security, terrorism
add a comment
Let me start by saying that I, like everyone, am horrified by the events in Orlando. That being said, it is important to understand some concepts inherent to security and why the argument of gun control to prevent attacks like those in Orlando is flawed.
Before I delve into my post I want to give some of my own background. I started my professional career in the US Marine Security Forces providing armed physical security for a critical national asset. I have provided Force Protection in a combat zone, was a Marine Scout/Sniper, and I have provided unarmed security in a level 3 psychiatric ward. I have conducted anti-piracy operations in and around the Gulf of Aden and finally, I have been an information security professional for nearly 20 years. I am also working in a Doctorate in CyberSecurity. I have written scores of articles and spoken at many dozens of security events. I may not know much in life but I understand security.
I read a letter from a mother of a Sandy Hook victim. In the letter she said:
“I am sorry that our tragedy here in Sandy Hook wasn’t enough to save your loved ones,”
While I feel for the mother and understand her very normal and appropriate response to losing her child, the argument simplifies the issue. Unfortunately, what we are dealing with is not a gun issue…it is a people issue. (more…)
Chris Mark in “Using Security Metrics” Book June 9, 2016Posted by Chris Mark in cybersecurity, Uncategorized.
Tags: Chris Mark, cyber, hack, network, risk, security, Security Metics, Tenable
add a comment
A number of months ago I was interviewed regarding my opinion on the effectiveness of security metrics. I was notified today that the eBook has been published. Titled “Using Security Metrics” the book includes 33 authors and according to the publisher:
“We asked 33 security experts how they communicate security program effectiveness to business executives and the Board.
They share their recommendations and best practices in this ebook. If you’re a security professional, you’ll find their insights indispensable for helping you better communicate with business executives and Board members who often do not speak the security language. Download this ebook to learn about:
- Security Metrics That Tell a Story to the Board
- Security Metrics That Help Boards Assess Risk
- Security Metrics for Threat Management
- Security Metrics that Drive Action in the Financial Services Industry
My contribution can be found starting on page 39. You can download the eBook here!.
1,000,000 InfoSec Job Openings in 2016! May 10, 2016Posted by Chris Mark in cybersecurity, Industry News, InfoSec & Privacy.
Tags: assurance, Breach, careers, Chris Mark, hack, information, job market, PCI, security
add a comment
A recent article in Forbes Magazine outlines the current and projected information security job market. According to the article the current job market is valued at $75 billion and is expected to grow to $170 Billion by 220. More profoundly, CISCO estimates that there are currently 1 million InfoSec job openings in the US with, according to Peninsula Press, 209,000 currently unfilled! According to Virginia Lehmkuhl-Dakhwe, director of the Jay Pinson STEM Education Center at San Jose State University “The number of jobs in information security is going to grow tenfold in the next 10 years,”
I have been fortunate to have had a great career in information security over the past 15 years. While my experience is unique, I have had opportunity to travel the World and work with some of the largest, and most complex companies around. I have spoken at scores of events and have published dozens of articles and white papers.
Last year I wrote a blog post about how to get into the InfoSec career field. Two things that many people may want to know off the bat. 1) a College Degree is NOT required (although often very helpful) and 2) The pay is VERY good. (basic supply and demand). In my experience most people could probably get into the field with anywhere from 9-18 months of self-study. You can get in quicker if you attend course. For more information, please read my blog post: Getting Info Information Assurance Careers.