A Scout Sniper’s Forensic Analysis of the Charlie Kirk Assassination: Terminal Ballistics, Hydro-static Shock, and the Science Behind the Shot July 11, 2026
Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.Tags: Assassination, ballistics, Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, Charlie Kirk Murder, Chris Mark, security, Shawn Ryan, sniper, TPUSA
6 comments
UPDATE! I have expanded upon this post and turned it into a much more comprehensive whitepaper. You can download here at Zenodo.org! or directly from this site below!
This is a long post but I think it is important. Recently I came across what I can only describe is an offensive AI ‘explanation’ by Candace Owen’ group that attempted to refute that Charlie Kirk was killed by a rifle round. More disturbingly, the ‘video’ is a mocking explanation of ‘conspiracy theorists’ who know what happened. The video was wrong at nearly every turn and was, quite frankly, offensively incorrect. Unfortunately, reading numerous comments on her page, a number of social media members believe and bought into her commentary. I want to refute her and explain with very direct math and science why it is 100% how Charlie Kirk was killed. Who am I to comment on this? I am a former Marine Corps Scout/Sniper, and Urban Sniper with combat time as a Sniper in the USMC. I was also a Force Reconnaissance Marine, and I have not only shot tens of thousands of rounds through rifles and am an avid hunter, but I also write extensively on firearm technology. In fact, I was selected for a DARPA counter sniper project during my time in the military due to my knowledge of ballistics and shooting.
Every time a high-profile shooting makes national news, social media fills with confident proclamations from people who have never fired a weapon in anger, never studied wound ballistics, and whose entire frame of reference comes from action movies and video games. The commentary ranges from the merely ignorant to the dangerously misleading (as in Ms. Owen’s) — and in some cases it is being amplified by public figures with large platforms who should know better. Recently, I was on a popular political commentator’s website and was amazed at how many people are now, suddenly, ballistics experts. Some of their comments were staggeringly ignorant. One person actually justified her very incorrect statement by saying she was the “ex-girlfriend of a hunter.” That is not a ballistics credential.
This post is not political. It is a ballistics education to provide insight into a terrible murder that is being overshadowed by a person’s pursuit of clicks, and money. That being said — for every so-called “ballistics expert” on social media who is doubting that Charlie Kirk was actually killed by that rifle at that distance, you need to read this post and understand a bit about how terminal ballistics actually works.
On September 10, 2025, at 12:23 PM local time, a single shot was fired from the roof of the Losee Center at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. The shooter was positioned approximately 142 yards from where Charlie Kirk was speaking. The weapon recovered was a Mauser-type bolt-action hunting rifle chambered in .30-06, loaded with (what appeared to be) Sierra GameKing 180-grain soft point ammunition. For consistency and we will simply say a non-bonded soft point bullet. Kirk was struck in the neck by a single bullet and was pronounced dead at Timpanogos Regional Hospital a short time later.
Within 5 minutes of the shooting my phone was blowing up with people asking what happened. My response: “Watching the impact, he was hit hard by a .30 cal. From an incline, close range. He was smacked so hard it looked like a .30-06”. Then, the hard question. Do you think he will live? My response? “No chance. His brain was dead nearly immediately and that was not a survivable wound. People asked why I thought that? Easy. He showed Decorticate posturing immediately upon being hit. Decorticate posturing is when arms flex inward, hands curl in. Indicates cortical or upper brain stem disruption. This is classic with hydro static shock impacting the brain (to be explained later). Classic high powered rifle shot that impacted the brain or nervous system.
People are claiming the distance is too far, the rifle was not ‘zeroed’ etc. etc. etc.. Many claimed that the wound characteristics don’t add up. That the bullet behavior was inconsistent with the stated circumstances. Every one of those claims reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of projectile physics, atmospheric ballistics, and terminal wound mechanics. This post addresses them directly, with math and science. What I am seeing circulate on social media right now needs to be corrected with facts, not speculation. A hunter is not a ballistics professional nor a professional at shooting humans.
I have radically updated the whitepaper as I received a number of requets from people wanting more information. You can download the whitepaper here or at Zenodo.com
MY LATEST BOOK RELEASED! “The Science of Security” May 16, 2026
Posted by Chris Mark in Industry News, Laws and Leglslation, security, security theater.add a comment
Announcing Scientia Securitatis: The Science of Security

After 34 years across nearly every security domain that exists — armed physical security at an overseas critical installation, combat force protection, security in a regional hospital’s psychiatric ward, payment-card industry compliance, armed maritime contracting off the East African coast, and a return to enterprise cybersecurity that has occupied the past decade — I have written the book I wish someone had written when I started.
Scientia Securitatis: The Science of Security — Theory, Frameworks, and Practice is available now.
The gap this book is intended to fill
The security profession does not lack books. Walk into any bookstore, scan any conference vendor floor, search any retailer’s security category, and you will find more material on cybersecurity, physical security, risk management, military theory, criminology, intelligence analysis, and organizational resilience than any single practitioner could read in a career. The field is overwhelmed with information.
What it lacks is integration.
Each security domain has developed its own vocabulary, its own frameworks, its own bestsellers, its own consultants. Each domain — when traced carefully to its analytical roots — is reaching for the same underlying concepts the next domain over named differently. Practitioners in physical and cybersecurity are working on the same analytical problems and rarely speak to one another. When they do, they discover that they have been duplicating each other’s work for decades.
Scientia Securitatis is an attempt to make that recognition the starting point of professional practice rather than an accident a few practitioners stumble into late in their careers.
What’s in the book
The book runs to 525 pages across 11 chapters and three appendices. It develops four original analytical frameworks:
- The Mark Heptad — a taxonomy of seven adversary motivations (financial, espionage, war/defense, facilitation, hacktivism, revenge, nuisance) that maps directly to deterrence strategy
- The IMCM Framework — Ignorance, Mistake, Complacency, Malice — for classifying human-induced vulnerabilities and matching them to specific interventions
- The DIVE Framework — Direction, Intensity, Vulnerability, Exposure — for assessing specific exposure surfaces
- The Multiplicative Security Model — the mathematical basis for defense-in-depth, with implications for how security architecture should actually combine
These original frameworks sit within a broader analytical apparatus drawn from criminology (Cohen and Felson’s Routine Activity Theory, Cornish and Clarke’s Twenty-Five Techniques of Situational Crime Prevention), cognitive science (Kahneman and Tversky on judgment under uncertainty), military theory (Sun Tzu, Clausewitz, contemporary unrestricted warfare doctrine), and systems-safety scholarship (James Reason’s Swiss Cheese Model, Charles Perrow’s normal-accident theory).
The book also examines — and critically engages — the victim-blaming reflex that dominates post-incident analysis, drawing on the foundational criminological literature on victim precipitation and contemporary case studies including Equifax, OPM, Target, and Snowflake.
A note on the Latin title
Scientia Securitatis translates as “the science of security,” and the choice was deliberate. The Latin signals that the book engages security as a serious analytical discipline whose intellectual roots long predate the cybersecurity industry’s tendency to treat its problems as historically unprecedented. The phenomena security examines are ancient; the framework for studying them rigorously has been available since at least the mid-20th century. The book argues that practitioners have, with rare exceptions, declined to use it.
Who this book is for
This book is for the practitioner who has noticed that decades of escalating security investment have not produced proportional security gains, and who wants to understand why. It is for the security executive building defensible programs across multiple domains. The policy professional confronting unrestricted warfare doctrine. The risk and compliance leader who suspects that frameworks alone are not stopping sophisticated adversaries. The graduate student approaching security as an analytical discipline rather than a job category.
It is not a tactical handbook. It is not a configuration guide. It is the analytical apparatus that determines whether tactical choices are well-made — the apparatus the field has been operating without.
Where to get it
Scientia Securitatis: The Science of Security is available now on Amazon in eBook, paperback, and hardcover formats:
If you find the book useful, please consider leaving a review. Self-published analytical nonfiction lives and dies by word-of-mouth among the practitioners it was written for — and a thoughtful Amazon review from a working professional is worth more to other professionals than any amount of marketing.
— Chris Mark
New Book Published! “The War God’s Face Has Become Indistinct” May 13, 2026
Posted by Chris Mark in cyberespionage, cybersecurity, Politics.Tags: asymmetric warfare, china, chinese hackers, Iran, News, politics, security, technology, Unrestricted Warfare
add a comment
I am proud to announce that after years of research, writing and formatting (the bane of my existence as a writer) my latest book about Chinese Unrestricted Warfare against the United States is finally published! You can buy either a Kindle, soft cover, or hardback. Here is a description of the book. The full title is “The War Gods Face Has Become Indistinct: China’s Unrestricted Warfare Doctrine and the War America Doesn’t Know It’s Fighting” It is 423 pages long and pretty heavy reading but insightful.

“In 1999, two Senior Colonels of the People’s Liberation Army published a doctrinal blueprint for how a militarily inferior power could defeat the United States without ever firing a shot. Twenty-five years later, every operational case in that blueprint has been executed against American interests.
The War God’s Face Has Become Indistinct is the first comprehensive analytical treatment of Chinese unrestricted warfare doctrine and its operational record against the United States from 2000 to 2026. Drawing on twenty-five years of professional experience in cybersecurity, military reconnaissance, and intelligence analysis, Chris Mark traces the doctrine’s seven operational domains — from the Volt Typhoon and Salt Typhoon cyber campaigns against American critical infrastructure, through the Thousand Talents Plan and the academic-warfare prosecutions, to the political cultivation operations that have reached from California congressional staff to municipal mayors.
What you will find inside:
• A complete operational analysis of the Qiao-Wang doctrine and its institutional adoption by the Chinese state
– The first systematic account of Volt Typhoon, Salt Typhoon, and the undersea-cable threat picture in a single analytical framework
– The Mark Heptad — the author’s original threat-assessment framework, used to analyze adversary motivation in seven categories
– The cost-exchange revolution in drone and missile warfare, and what the Israel-Iran engagement of April 2024 revealed about the next conflict
– The Russia-Iran-North Korea adversary architectures examined through the same doctrinal lens
– A six-domain framework for democratic response that does not require America to become what it is defending against
For policy professionals, intelligence community readers, military officers, and the educated public who follow national security — this book provides the analytical vocabulary the contemporary American strategic environment requires.“
Devil in Black Boots- Snipers in Somalia PodCast March 31, 2024
Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.Tags: cybersecurity, SASR, Scout Sniper, security, Somalia, USMC
add a comment
Here is my latest PodCast….
How to publish your first Article in a Magazine! April 5, 2020
Posted by Chris Mark in Uncategorized.Tags: articles, Chris Mark, counter terrorism, data breach, national review, publishing, security, sniper
add a comment
As we are all spending time at home, I thought I would publish a quick video on how to write and publish an article. I have published scores of articles and frequently get asked how to identify a topic, research, write and then publish an article. This is about a 40 minute discussion of what has been successful for me! I hope you enjoy! Would love any feedback anyone has!! Here is where you can download the actual preso with narration. Easier to watch. https://globalriskinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/publishing-your-first-article.ppsx