(UPDATE)-“Interesting” Logic & Analysis – Verizon’s 2012 Data Breach Report April 17, 2012
Posted by Chris Mark in Industry News, InfoSec & Privacy, terrorism.Tags: anonymous, Chris Mark, CSOonline, cybercrime, hacktivism, InfoSec, mark consulting group, security, Verizon data breach report
2 comments
I received a very insightful comment from one of the Verizon authors and thought it prudent to share. I think this explanation is very helpful for companies looking at infosec controls. Here it is, in part(emphasis added): “You make a valid point about the fact that a determined attacker would simply try again if the first attempt failed. However, our finding that most breaches are avoidable through relatively simple controls doesn’t overlook this as you suggest. Our data show that most criminals aren’t determined to breach a particular victim and likely won’t try again if met with decent resistance. In fact, the extreme opportunistic nature of target selection means they likely won’t even be attacked w certain controls in place because automated probes will skip on down the street after jiggling the door handle a bit.“ You can read the full comment, in ‘comments’. The entire post is you continue reading. (more…)
“Privacy, Terrorism, Blowback, and Crime” – Where to start? April 10, 2012
Posted by Chris Mark in Industry News, Laws and Leglslation, terrorism.Tags: al qaeda, Chris Mark, fox news, mark consulting group, Raptor, security, terrorism
add a comment
There is an interesting story on the front page of Foxnews this morning where a self-proclaimed patriot hacker who calls himself “The Raptor” is “…waging his own war on terror..” by taking down online forums used by Al Qaeda sympathizers. Certainly, known, and admitted terrorist organizations are not in the public interest. This blog is not justifying their position their tactics, or anything else they do.
The purpose of this post is to question the value of an individual (if you believe his tweets) taking unilateral action and then basking in the attention given to his actions. While vigilante actions may have a visceral appeal to many (including this author, at times) do actions such as this exacerbate the situation? Additionally, one has to ask whether he is right in taking unilateral action? As an American my gut reaction is to applaud the person but upon closer review, I don’t know if his actions are positive or altruistic.
In espionage there is a term called Blowback that refers to the unintended consequences of a covert action. (more…)
Ethical Relativism- Sky News Morphs into Anonymous? April 5, 2012
Posted by Chris Mark in Industry News, InfoSec & Privacy, Laws and Leglslation.Tags: Chris Mark, cybersecurity, data breach, emall hacking, mark consulting group, Murdoch, NewsCorp, privacy
2 comments
By now most are probably aware of the email hacking scandal that severely damaged Rupert Murdoch’s NewsCorp empire. NewsCorp reporters were caught illegally accessing phone calls of the UK Royal family and hacking into email accounts of individuals. Murdochs’ son had to resign from his position as Chairman of BSkyB which own UK’s Sky News.
According to a report on CNN this morning UK news channel Sky News said Thursday it had authorized its journalists to hack into the e-mail of individual members of the public on two occasions. The very same people (journalists) that will scream for “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press” and claim journalistic integrity are now violating the public’s privacy in a scramble to maintain market share and increase revenue? (more…)
“Oh the humanity!”- Financial Institution Breached 3 Times in 2 Weeks! April 4, 2012
Posted by Chris Mark in Data Breach, Industry News, Uncategorized.Tags: bank robberies, Chris Mark, data breach, Global Payments, InfoSec, mark consulting group, PCI DSS, risk management
add a comment
STOP THE PRESSES! According to the Patriot Ledger, a financial institution’s security was breached 3 times in 2 weeks and assets were stolen. The media, however, has been quiet on the story. I have not heard a single Gartner or other analyst publicly eviscerate the financial institution for their poor security practices nor has Information Week, CNN, or any other major media outlet opined on the breaches. Why?
The financial institution was a actually a bank branch and the breaches were not data thefts rather they were good old fashioned bank robberies. In 1968, in response to increasingly violent and frequent bank robberies, the US Government passed the Code of Federal Regulations Title 12 part 208.61- Bank Security Procedures. The purpose of the Act is as follows: (more…)

